Hoy sí

Bernanke explicó QE2 para el público en el Washington Post el jueves pasado. El párrafo clave es el siguiente:

This approach eased financial conditions in the past and, so far, looks to be effective again. Stock prices rose and long-term interest rates fell when investors began to anticipate the most recent action. Easier financial conditions will promote economic growth. For example, lower mortgage rates will make housing more affordable and allow more homeowners to refinance. Lower corporate bond rates will encourage investment. And higher stock prices will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence, which can also spur spending. Increased spending will lead to higher incomes and profits that, in a virtuous circle, will further support economic expansion.

Justifca otra ronda de relajamiento cuantitativa (quantitative easing, or QE) con base en lo siguiente:

1. Funcionó en el pasado (en la primera ronda).
2. Con sólo anunciar la intención avanzó la bolsa de valores.
3. Promoverá crecimiento económico: bajando las tasas de interés hipotecarias; bajando los rendimientos de los bonos corporativos (lo que promoverá inversión fija); elevando los precios accionarios, lo que, por enriquecer a los consumidores, puede impulsar más gasto.

En otras palabras, la Fed considera que otra ronda de QE se transmitirá a la economía por que los mismos canales que una decisión de política moonetaria normal (una reducción en la tasa de política monetaria).

Pero con una excepción: antes no se justificaban decisiones de política monetaria por su efecto en los precios accionarios.

Hoy sí.

Sígueme en Twitter: @gsignoret

Power and Policy Team update (English)

Isabel Gil y Patrick Signoret

War in Iraq
By August 31st America´s mission in Iraq will end, said president Obama. According to the promises made during his campaign, by the end of this month there will only be 50,000 troops in Iraq, which will be in charge of supporting and training Iraqi security forces. These troops will leave Iraq at the end of 2011. Meanwhile, Iraq is in political deadlock, five months after the parliamentary elections. Here’s a link to Obama's full speech: http://tinyurl.com/24w3j95 (NYT, FT, White House)

Israel
Ban Ki-moon formally announced the creation of a commission to investigate the incident of the Gaza flotilla. Israel, who had previously been reluctant, announced its cooperation on Monday.
(NYT)

Bernanke speech
One week before the next interest rate setting meeting, Bernanke gave a speech in South California where he argued that even though the financial crisis seems to have passed, the U.S. has still a long way to go in order to achieve full economic recovery. “A long way to go” and “caution” were the main words that stuck in markets and newspapers.
(FT)

Hamilton interprets Bernanke

James Hamilton explains how to interpret the Treasury's $20 bn in supplementary loss protection mentioned by Bernanke in his 13 January 2009 speech about the recent blowing up of the Fed's balance sheet. Full interpretation today would require foreknowledge of how much the Fed will end up lending through its latest facility, TALF:

Bernanke also discussed some of the Fed's new plans:

In addition, the Federal Reserve and the Treasury have jointly announced a facility that will lend against AAA-rated asset-backed securities collateralized by student loans, auto loans, credit card loans, and loans guaranteed by the Small Business Administration. The Federal Reserve's credit risk exposure in the latter facility will be minimal, because the collateral will be subject to a "haircut" and the Treasury is providing $20 billion of capital as supplementary loss protection. We expect this facility to be operational next month.

Here at least we have a number-- $20 billion-- that will give us some idea of what Bernanke assesses the ballpark risks to be. If, for example, we see that the Fed lends $100 billion in this program, I'd take that to mean he's thinking the underlying assets are really worth at least 80 cents on the dollar; if $200 billion, we're talking about 90 cents on the dollar. If this gets into the hundreds of billions, it's hard to see how $20 billion would be regarded as a significant equity cushion.

Thanks, James Hamilton.